The Topography of a Neutron Star

The Topography of a Neutron Star

If this really is the topography of a neutron star then it’s a pure correlation of random events that allowed me to create this image. Unlike some of my other images, this image has two independent algorithms which, follows the same rules and is loosely based based on a fractal inverse square law matrix and with it I can’t help but believe that I’m right about the inverse square law being the unified field theory and that when you think about it, it is, utterly terrifying simply because, we have either been lied to for the last 400+ years or mankind has been chasing dragons looking for a answer to everything, when we already had the answer, it’s just that we failed to really understand it. If that’s the case then science and scientists have just been dressing up the universe in their own clothes to claim the immortal glory that such a immense discovery about the universe would bring to our civilisation. If it’s all been a lie, then the global conspiracy to keep this a secret has been in place since Newton’s discovered it, 400+ years ago. 

The picture above is actually just two photographs of my fireplace and you can actually make out my fireplace if you know how see it. The picture like many other pictures that I have created has a 3D holography to it as it actually appears to stand off the picture and that’s because the pictures are taken like how you would create a stereoscopic image, but unlike such an image my photos are not side by side but actually part of the same frame. 

The surfaces within the frames are the photos, the frames, of which there are two separate frames in the above images but the content is exactly the same they both contain nothing but two of the same photographs. Each frame runs a different fractal algorithm, I’m calling it a fractal algorithm but I actually don’t really have a clue what a algorithm really is but, my understanding of them is that it’s a set of logical instructions. The algorithm can run indefinitely and it follows a simple rule, it has to create an image that has pattern that looks pleasing to the eye, which usually is symmetrical and has structured patterns, not all photos creates the desired results but all frames create the desired effect. One thing I have noticed is that there are limits on these pictures and the above is pushing that limit and the truth is I was so far into the algorithm at the time that, there’s probably no way to replicate it as all these images can be replicated with the original image or images from the beginning. The only thing I have noticed is that computers can’t actually copy my images exactly, for example if I upload this image to the internet and then download it, the image will have changed from the original jpg I uploaded. I believe that’s because computers are not powerful enough to accurately copy the symmetry of my actual images and information is added, presumably that came from the computer that it was stored on as, the images is uploaded and then downloaded. The picture above is massive really and my computers struggle with it as it is and there’s currently no way to upload the original without it looking different. 

So why is it called the Topography of a Neutron Star? 

Well because it is, relative to me, you see, the thing is while all our new technology is telling scientists that we have finally managed to detect the gravitational waves of the collisions of massive objects like black holes and neutron starts, my pictures are saying your just detecting me and my thoughts. I know that sounds bizarre but the thing is, if you can isolate everything except gravitational waves then you also allow consciousness to be detected and even with a universal quantum computer and it processing everything you can do and think in all your possible choices and states so it can isolate everyone from being detected and affecting the machine you still ultimately end up detecting something that can be considered conscious simply because unlike what we are told space time is a two dimensional surface with a one dimensional framework, and for such a system to work, you are looking for framework and a surface that is a tight entropic system, something that has no room other than to be what it is. To get to that from the point view of science requires vast resources and energy expenditure and according to relativity anything that has mass needs an energy expenditure that’s almost infinite in order to reach such a tight entropic system anything beyond requires infinite amount of energy and so is classed as a singularity where laws of physics break down. 

I recently thought that’s not the case and the reason for that is, the universe has to be explainable, if it’s not then it’s has to be our understanding of it that’s wrong and I think that’s the case with our laws of physics, we don’t see them and so we cannot understand them without creating a framework, but the framework we have created is correct but doesn’t make any sense we have two theories that are undisputed and unsinkable but these theories are just effects of our observation on reality that make sense, but that’s my point they are our observations. The framework of our observation is quantum mechanics and our experience within its framework is relative, both theories are created by our observation of, and research into what is essentially nothing but the inverse square law. Atoms and quantum physics, relativity and gravity come naturally from its frames of reference.  

 (C) Sean O’Flaherty