Quantum Nonsense

New, Hi Res photo shows beagle2 made it to the surface of Mars and is partially open. But the picture shows the space craft did not open fully, to reveal the antenna. So it could not broadcast home! There is suggestion that it may have done some scientific work, but it could not broadcast due to its unfortunate position. Here is a link from the BBC Beagle probe 'seen in shaper view So I have cunning plan! We should try and open up the beagle2, so it can speak to us! Using nothing but the power of the mind and a quantum trick!  Ok, I know this is a long shot but! It's not impossible. Seen as no one is looking at my blog and I know that no one should be looking at my blog. But quantum algorithms are being used to make it hard for bloggers to gain a foot hold in the blogosphere! So when I don't advertise my blog using social media, I get around 500 to 600 hits a month. You would think that, by using social media, I would in fact get more hits! But mysteriously that is n...

I was going to write something that would blow your socks off, but seen as no one is looking, due to mysterious forces at work. You know who you are! Google, etc, etc, quantum algorithms etc. Your not paying, your not playing our tune and not dressing in our clothes. So I have decided post something else instead.

It's hard to know where I should start, because all of the top theoretical physics equations, are fairy tales! I know theoretical physicists all babbling on about how beautiful an equation is or can be! Ok, that's fine, but I honestly can't see any beauty in an equation. Not what so ever! In fact some are down right ugly and complete beasts! Which is good, am not saying there rubbish! Because clearly they are not. But why do they all look like fairy tales & fables?  To understand the universe at the moment, I would have to learn:- Mathematics , I would have to be really good at this, in fact I would have to be a genius mathematician! Physics, same again. English,  because I am English and you would have to be good at this as well. But if like me and many others in England, we were not actually given any English lessons at school, because the British government have a policy of not giving good English lessons to, English people! So we all learnt to speak slang, ...

In my close up, in the last post . I was showing that twisted frames on a surface, have to be massive! If a twisted frame occurs in a particle accelerator, the detector will become part of the frame, as it's classed as an observer. So even if a Black Hole is tiny, the detector would, in fact project the information away, to the horizon of the observers. Which will be bigger and further away than ever!  To detect a black hole in a particle accelerator, mirrors would have to be set up, to allow information to pass through, like LIGO. Then somehow they would have to messure the effect on space time on the imaginary horizon of ATLAS if Hawking radiation exists it will be effecting information flowing in.. Which would have to be set at the four corners of the horizons diameter which is about 2.3325 miles, away from the centre of the detector. The corners being further away. Any small black hole would also, lay flat on the Earths surface not horizontal and flip over to line up with th...

The current ATLAS detector is 25meters in diameter, for a working quantum computer or a decent detector. ATLAS, according to my picture would need to be 25,000 meters in diameter! About 15.53428 miles. As the central core above is about 0.1mm wide when the picture is 10cm in size. As above. Actually it's about a 1/3 of a millimetre but I don't have an accurate ruler on me at the moment. Which means The LHC has the potential to create a 2.3325mile imaginary event horizon where, they cannot detect anything. Also nothing would be seen past the surface information, so it would have to be 1.16 miles high in diameter. As all black holes must be classed as monopoles. Nothing would be seen under the information surface. But dont get me wrong, I am not talking about an actual black hole. It's the LHC's black holes in their dectectors I am talking about.